Quantcast

John Lackey brings up Nelson Cruz’s PED use after Cruz shells him

John-Lackey-beer-drinking-reports-retardedNelson Cruz had a huge night for the Baltimore Orioles in their 7-4 win over the Boston Red Sox on Saturday night. Cruz went 5-for-5 including a homer, single and double of Red Sox starting pitcher John Lackey. When Lackey was asked about Cruz’s performance after the game, he conveniently hinted at Cruz’s history of performance-enhancing drug use.

“I’m not going to comment on him,” Lackey said, via ESPN.com. “I’ve got nothing to say about him. There are some things I’d like to say, but I’m not going to. You guys forget pretty conveniently about stuff.”

Nice try, John, but you already said plenty. Players who have never cheated have every right to feel bitter toward Cruz in the wake of his 50-game suspension last season. The 34-year-old slugger accepted his punishment and served the ban, but that doesn’t mean everyone is forced to forgive him.

That said, Lackey made himself look bad by pulling the “yeah, but he’s a cheater” card after Cruz teed off on him. Had Cruz gone 0-for-3 with three strikeouts against Lackey, we all know there would have been no mention of his involvement with Biogenesis.

Orioles manager Buck Showalter was later asked about Lackey’s comments on ESPN Radio’s “Mike Lupica Show.”

“There’s so many insinuations, quite frankly, about people in every club. You usually don’t hear those comments after a shutout or something,” Showalter said. I mean [Lackey's] doing really well. He’s up throwing 93, 95 again and he’s got one of the top ERAs in the American League, which with the DH means all of baseball. He’s a good pitcher, so God bless him. He was good yesterday.”

Lackey has always been outspoken about PED use. Last year, he said Alex Rodriguez should not be allowed to play while he appealed his 211-game suspension. This time around, Lackey’s comments just reeked of sour grapes.



Around The Web

  • Matt

    First of all, you’re correct, had he not gone 5-5 it wouldn’t have been mentioned but only because the question would have never been asked but the reporter. How does that make Lackey any less reasonable in mentioning it. Also, you intimate that he shouldn’t have said it because of cruz’s big day then mention that he said it about A-Rod, even though he was not facing him at the time. Doesn’t that kind of ruin your argument? Sure, he served his mandated penalty, but that doesn’t mean he’s not still reaping the benefits of his cheating and I think it should be mentioned far more often, not less.

  • PaulieVegas

    Lackey only said what everyone outside Baltimore is thinking.

  • Ronald

    You bite your tongue Steve, John “Big Hoss” Lackey is a LEGEND. Guy throws nothing but chestnuts roasting on an open fire flames heaters, and he tells it how it is. Sure he sounds like sour grapes but if you don’t agree with him you’re a Baltimore homer. Lackey the straight shooter for the win!!!!!!