<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Doesn&#8217;t the NBA Re-seed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larrybrownsports.com/basketball/why-doesnt-the-nba-re-seed/406/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larrybrownsports.com/basketball/why-doesnt-the-nba-re-seed/406</link>
	<description>Brown Bag it, Baby</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gene</title>
		<link>http://larrybrownsports.com/basketball/why-doesnt-the-nba-re-seed/406#comment-3037</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 17:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrybrownsports.com/2007/05/04/why-doesnt-the-nba-re-seed/#comment-3037</guid>
		<description>I couldn't have stated it any better myself.  You are absolutely correct on all fronts.  I would add one comment, and that is about the stupidity of calling Utah and Miami the #4 seeds.  The NBA rules committee should change the rule so that the division winners can be guanranteed no worse than the #5 seed, not the number 4.  Think about it, NBA.  You want a division winner not to play the high seeds in round one.  Well, #4 and #5 play each other, so that problem is solved.  Since Houston and Chicago, the teams with the better records, got the home court, why go through the charade of calling them #5, when they have the home court advantage.  Exactly what benefit was attained by Miami and Utah in being called the #4 seeds?  They were in the same game, in the same bracket, against the same opponent, only the opponenet got the benefit of home court.  That is an embarrassing situation, to say the least.  Get with it, Stern and Company!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t have stated it any better myself.  You are absolutely correct on all fronts.  I would add one comment, and that is about the stupidity of calling Utah and Miami the #4 seeds.  The NBA rules committee should change the rule so that the division winners can be guanranteed no worse than the #5 seed, not the number 4.  Think about it, NBA.  You want a division winner not to play the high seeds in round one.  Well, #4 and #5 play each other, so that problem is solved.  Since Houston and Chicago, the teams with the better records, got the home court, why go through the charade of calling them #5, when they have the home court advantage.  Exactly what benefit was attained by Miami and Utah in being called the #4 seeds?  They were in the same game, in the same bracket, against the same opponent, only the opponenet got the benefit of home court.  That is an embarrassing situation, to say the least.  Get with it, Stern and Company!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
