ESPN tennis analyst LZ Granderson must be a serious sucker if he was this disappointed about Gael Monfils’ loss to Novak Djokovic in the semifinals of the US Open on Friday.
Monfils lost to Djokovic in four sets — 6-3, 6-2, 3-6, 6-2 in what amounted to the Frenchman’s best ever showing at the US Open. After the match, which Granderson found disappointing, the ESPN analyst got really passionate about how let down he was and “flabbergasted” at the result.
LZ Granderson FLABBERGASTED that Gael Monfils lost to Novak Djokovic despite being 0-13 against him all time umm ok pic.twitter.com/jypVUw0K1f
— Larry Brown (@LBSports) September 9, 2016
Umm, does LZ even do any research? Monfils entered the match 0-12 all-time against Djokovic and is now 0-13 against him.
Does LZ get disappointed and disgusted when the Browns can’t beat the Patriots or when Army loses to Notre Dame for the 60th time in a row? Obviously Monfils is still a top-15 player — he was seeded 10th for this event — but let’s put things in perspective. Monfils had only made it past the quarterfinals of a major ONCE prior to this US Open. Monfils losing to the world’s No. 1 player, who has already won two grand slam events this year and is 12-0 against Monfils all-time, should be expected, not a letdown.
Next you’re going to tell me LZ gets disappointed when Maria Sharapova gets steamrolled by Serena Williams in the finals of grand slams.
Novak Djokovic appeared unstoppable at the start of the grass court season, but since then, a significant dip in form has seen his chances at a calendar year grand slam evaporate.
Djokovic said following the U.S. Open draw that mental issues were his downfall at Wimbledon, stemming particularly from some things that were happening in his private life.
“It was nothing physical, it was not an injury,” Djokovic said at the draw, via Leo Schlink of the Herald Sun. “It was some other things that I was going through privately. But it was nothing linked to the wrist injury I got in Rio.
“We all have private issues and things that are more challenges than issues, things we have to encounter and overcome in order to evolve as a human being. That was the period for me. Was resolved and life is going on like everything else.”
He did say that his loss at the Olympics was due in part to a wrist injury that he is still battling.
Djokovic lost shockingly to Sam Querrey at Wimbledon, and there was significant speculation about Djokovic’s wife Jelena in the British press at the time. That was likely a factor.
It’s been an odd year for Djokovic. He had to face a bit of controversy over some comments he made earlier in the season, and it’s been a struggle since Wimbledon. He’ll try to turn things around at Flushing Meadows, where he has won twice in his career, including 2015.
Novak Djokovic had a tough day with chair umpire Damian Steiner during his loss to Andy Murray in the finals of the Rome Masters on Sunday.
Nole fell in straight sets 6-3, 6-3 to Murray and had some exchanges with Steiner. First he got a warning for throwing his racket in the second set, and then he argued with the umpire over the court conditions.
You can hear Djokovic lobby for a delay in action because of what he deemed unsafe court conditions:
Murray agreed about the court conditions and understood Nole’s frustrations.
Djokovic, meanwhile, elaborated on his issues with Steiner.
“These kind of matches are important for both players,” he said after the match via The Guardian. “There is a lot at stake. When you play a rival, and of course you want to win, sometimes you get too emotional.
“I threw a racket, it bounced over the fence and I got a warning instantly. So the chair umpire was on fire today. He really wanted to show his authority to me. So congratulations to him.”
Losing the match no doubt played a big role in the Serb’s frustration.
Novak Djokovic issued a statement on his Facebook page Tuesday to address a controversy caused by his comments about gender and equal pay.
The world No. 1-ranked tennis player responded to the Indian Wells CEO’s sexist remarks about women riding the coattails of men. Djokovic said men deserve a greater share of prize money at combined events currently because metrics show they are bigger draws. Many took his statement to mean that Djokovic thinks men deserve more money because they are men. That obviously led to tons of negative publicity and responses.
Djokovic posted this statement on Facebook as a clarification:
I typically use this page to share my excitement with you, especially after big wins.
But this time I had to take a few deep breaths before addressing you. As you may have seen, I was asked to comment on a controversy that wasn’t of my making. Euphoria and adrenalin after the win on Sunday got the best of me and I’ve made some comments that are not the best articulation of my view, and I would like to clarify them.
As you all know, I care deeply about the future of the game and all of the players. Tennis helped me so much in my life and being where I am today, I felt the need to speak about the fairer and better distribution of funds across the board – this was meant for both men and women. We all have to fight for what we deserve. This was never meant to be made into a fight between genders and differences in pay, but in the way all players are rewarded for their play and effort.
Tennis is a sport that I love and that gave me the opportunity to help others who still have a long way to go to achieve their dreams. This was my view all along and I want to apologize to anyone who has taken this the wrong way.
Djokovic is not necessarily backing down from his position; he is just trying to clarify things. What got cut out of his comments were that he feels the split of money should be based on metrics such as fan interest. He even said if it’s shown women are more popular, they should get a greater share of prize money than men.
Even with his clarification, that problem won’t stop someone like Serena Williams from smacking him down and thinking he’s sexist. I explain in more detail here why he is not.
Serena Williams on Tuesday responded to Novak Djokovic’s comments on pay by gender in tennis by asking how he would explain his comments to children. Though Williams gave strong comments, her remarks indicate she may not have heard the entirety of Djokovic’s remarks.
The debate about equal pay was renewed when Indiana Wells CEO Raymond Moore made some sexist remarks saying women should be on their knees being thankful that some popular men came along to help the sport of tennis. His remarks were inappropriate, offensive, and ignored the accomplishments and contributions any popular female players made to the sport over time.
Though world No. 1 male player Djokovic did not say women should be on their knees thanking the men, he did say he felt for combined events that pay should not just outright be equal, but rather based on who the bigger draw is and who’s bringing more money into the pot. He even said that if women were more popular and doing bigger ratings, they should receive MORE pay than the men.
He did not argue for men to be paid more simply because they are men; he said he wants the pay to be based on metrics of interest in the sport.
“I think that our men’s tennis world, ATP world, should fight for more because the stats are showing that we have much more spectators on the men’s tennis matches,” Djokovic said. “I think that’s one of the, you know, reasons why maybe we should get awarded more. Women should fight for what they think they deserve and we should fight for what we think we deserve.
“I think as long as it’s like that and there is data and stats available and information, upon who attracts more attention, spectators, who sells more tickets and stuff like that, in relation to that it has to be fairly distributed.”
Djokovic did not say nobody wants to watch women or that they aren’t draws. He just wants more because he thinks he’s a bigger draw currently. It’s a fluid matter, not a statement that men should now, always and forever be paid more than women because they are men.
However, Serena’s response indicated she did not listen or hear Djokovic’s comments.
With the Australian Open just around the corner, both Novak Djokovic and Roger Federer will have the opportunity to do what no tennis player has done before: break the $100 million barrier in on-court earnings.
According to NDTV Sports, Djokovic enters the season with just over $94 million to his name, while Federer has claimed $97.3 million in career winnings.
On the surface, Federer seems more likely to surpass the $100 million mark first, especially given that the winner of the Aussie Open will claim a $3.85 million prize. However, Federer, at age 34, hasn’t won a major since 2012, while the 28-year-old Djokovic is the reigning men’s champion at the event.
For both men, it is a matter of when, not if, and nobody else even threatens their chances. Rafael Nadal’s career earnings are at $75 million, while Serena Williams has earned around $74 million in the less lucrative women’s game. It will definitely be a subplot to watch once everyone convenes in Melbourne in just over three weeks.
It wasn’t just Novak Djokovic and Roger Federer battling at the US Open on Sunday; their wives were also dueling.
Throughout the US Open finals, ESPN’s cameras kept flashing to Mirka Federer and Jelena Djokovic for their reactions to the action. At times they were tense, but the rest of the time they were their husbands’ biggest supporters as they clapped following good points.
Here are both wives as they cheered on their husbands at various points in the match:
Mirka was joined in the Federer box by Roger’s dad and coach Stefan Edberg. Coach oris Becker was also in Djokovic’s box along with Jelena.
Federer’s children — two sets of twins — must have been at home. Ditto with Djokovic’s son, who was born last year, months after Nole and Jelena got married during the summer. The Djokovics have been dating since 2005, while the Federers have been married since 2009. Cool fact: Roger’s wife Mirka used to be a professional tennis player and the two met at the 2000 Olympics.