The NFL’s best backfield will have all hands on deck Thursday night, as Mark Ingram is expected to play despite battling a toe injury.
ESPN’s Adam Schefter reports that Ingram, who was limited all week in practice and is listed as questionable, will play against the Atlanta Falcons.
Saints’ RB Mark Ingram, listed as questionable for tonight’s game vs Falcons due to a toe injury, is expected to play, per source.
— Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) December 7, 2017
Ingram and dynamic rookie Alvin Kamara are largely responsible for the Saints being one of the biggest surprises in the NFL this season. Ingram has rushed for 922 yards and scored nine touchdowns, while Kamara has 1,220 yards from scrimmage and has scored 11 touchdowns. A New Orleans offense that is known for being pass-heavy has taken on an entirely new identity, and the result is a 9-3 record.
If the Saints can beat the Falcons Thursday night, Atlanta would will fall to 7-6 and be three games out of first in the NFC South. New Orleans would then only have to worry about protecting their division lead from the Carolina Panthers down the stretch.
- Mark Ingram
Week 8 started on Thursday night with a blowout win for the Baltimore Ravens. The rest of the week produced games that were closer, with the Houston-Seattle game delivering a particularly awesome ending. The Jaguars had the week off, which means at least one quarterback was spared an embarrassing game. But between special teams, poor rushing attacks, and some quarterbacks, there were plenty of disappointments in the week.
Here’s a look at the biggest disappointments of Week 8.
Detroit Lions’ red zone offense
The Detroit Lions looked incredible on Sunday night against the Pittsburgh Steelers … as long as you don’t count what happened in the red zone. Their offense simply could not deliver in the red zone, and that cost them the game. They took five trips to the red zone and came away with only nine points. They failed to score a touchdown, settled for three field goals, and turned the ball over on downs twice.
They had a first-and-goal from the 10 in the second quarter and ended up kicking a 37-yard field goal. They had a 1st-and-10 from the 16 before halftime and kicked a 34-yard field goal. In the third quarter, they had a 2nd-and-goal from the 1 and got stopped three plays in a row and turned it over on downs. Then they gave up a 98-yard touchdown pass. Then for the second possession in a row they got a 1st-and-goal at the 4 and took the ball to the 1, but this time they took the field goal. After going for the field goal that time, they were down 20-15 on their next trip to the red zone. They were forced to go for it on 4th-and-7 from the 8 and turned it over on downs again.
Detroit’s defense kept them in the game. The red zone offense failed them badly.
Jameis Winston, QB, Buccaneers
Winston would probably be near the top of any list of disappointments of the season, as the third-year quarterback is still making mistakes and failing to correct them despite being surrounded by plenty of weapons. On Sunday, Winston threw two more interceptions, lost a fumble, threw the ball all over the place, and failed to get the ball into the end zone. His Bucs fell to 2-5 with their home loss to the Carolina Panthers. Perhaps his lingering shoulder issue has something to do with his poor performance, but if that’s the case, he shouldn’t be playing — he was not good on Sunday.
With all the excitement coming out of New Orleans Saints practice over the way Adrian Peterson looks, it’s easy to forget that Peterson may not even be the team’s starter. That job will likely belong to Mark Ingram, who insists he is not concerned about losing it.
On Sunday, Ingram told reporters he is not afraid of having to compete for playing time — even against one of the greatest backs of all time.
“It doesn’t matter who’s in the backfield with me, who I’m competing with, I’m always going to give my 100 percent all,” Ingram said, per Mike Triplett of ESPN.com. “I respect him and everything he’s done. He’s still a great player; he’s overcome a lot of adversity. But at the end of the day, I’m going to compete, no matter who it is. Not afraid of competition, no matter how high on the totem pole they are. I’m always going to compete, I’m always going to give my best.”
Ingram, who sat out of the first two weeks of OTAs with an undisclosed injury, said he and Peterson feel they can make each other better players.
“We help each other,” Ingram explained. “He’s new to the system, so I can help him with some play calls and small nuances within the offense. And he’s an elite runner, one of the best that we’ve seen in this game. So just to see how he runs, how he practices, makes us all better.”
After hearing some of the things Saints players and coaches have said about Peterson early on, you have to assume the 32-year-old is going to get plenty of touches. Sean Payton will likely keep both backs heavily involved, but Ingram may not carry the ball more than 200 times like he did last season.
With the New Orleans Saints having signed one of the best running backs in NFL history in Adrian Peterson, there have been some rumblings that Mark Ingram could be on the trading block.
Not so, say multiple reporters.
After Saints center Max Unger suffered a foot injury last week that could force him to miss the start of the season, there was speculation that Ingram could become expendable if New Orleans gets desperate for offensive line help. The most popular rumor is that the Philadelphia Eagles, who need a power running back, could part ways with veteran center Jason Kelce.
On Wednesday, ESPN’s Adam Schefter told 97.5 The Fanatic that there is “absolutely nothing” to the reports of a potential Ingram-for-Kelce swap.
“There is absolutely nothing to that. There was absolutely never anything to that,” Schefter said, as transcribed by Matt Lombardo of NJ.com. “I spoke to people in both organizations, and they both said the same thing; ‘We’ve never spoken.’ I don’t know where that started. Maybe that would start talks up now, but I doubt it based on those reactions from both organizations. That was never in the works. I don’t want to say it would never happen, because stranger things have happened, but I’m just telling you there is nothing to that as of right now.”
And if Schefter’s word isn’t good enough for you, Jimmy Kempski of Philly Voice said in a Q&A with fans that he does not expect the Eagles to trade for Ingram.
Peterson is a huge name with huge ability, but he’s far from a sure thing. Both he and Ingram have had some injury issues in recent years, so it would be wise for the Saints to use them as compliments to one another. Plus, Unger still has a shot to be ready for the start of the regular season.
Despite the massive impact rival executives believe Peterson could make in New Orleans, Ingram likely isn’t going anywhere.
- Mark Ingram
Shortly after the Cleveland Browns selected Miami tight end David Njoku in the first-round of the 2017 NFL Draft, veteran Gary Barnidge tweeted at the newcomer, welcoming him to the family. Barnidge told Njoku to get ready for work. A few short hours later, Barnidge was back on Twitter, but this time he was saying farewell to the Browns and their fans, because the selection of Njoku meant his release.
The NFL is a business — a brutal business — and Barnidge experienced that firsthand. There was a new tight end in town, and before they even got onto the field, that rookie had taken his job.
Barnidge won’t be the only player to find himself without a job following the NFL Draft. In fact, quite a few veterans around the league probably will. That’s just the nature of the game.
Here are 10 other players who find their jobs in jeopardy following the NFL Draft.
10. Will Tye (Tight End, New York Giants)
The Giants had already signed former Minnesota Vikings tight end Rhett Ellison prior to the NFL Draft, which potentially put several jobs in jeopardy. After drafting Mississippi tight end Evan Engram in the first round, those jobs are now even more in question.
Will Tye has essentially taken over as the team’s starter following the decline of Larry Donnell, who remains unsigned. But Tye had been pushed by 2016 sixth-round pick Jerell Adams a season ago. The Giants have been impressed with Adams’ multi-faceted versatility, but acknowledge there’s still some development needed.
Unlikely to carry more than three tight ends, Tye could be the odd man out for the Giants despite doing a solid job over the past two seasons, hauling in 90 receptions for 859 yards and four touchdowns.
9. Chris Ivory (Running Back, Jacksonville Jaguars)
Mark Ingram may not have to sleep with one eye open after all.
According to New Orleans Saints beat writer Nick Underhill of The New Orleans Advocate on Monday, Ingram would remain the team’s lead running back even if they sign free agent Adrian Peterson.
Ingram would be the lead back. Peterson would be his backup. The Saints ran the ball 404 times last year. https://t.co/7Hr7tF80K4
— Nick Underhill (@nick_underhill) April 24, 2017
Ingram, 27, earned 205 of those 404 carries last season, rushing for 1,043 yards and six touchdowns. We heard earlier in the day that the Saints had already begun negotiating a contract with the 32-year-old Peterson. But Ingram has clear edges over Peterson in at least age, health, pass-catching, and pass protection, so it makes sense for New Orleans to maintain their backfield pecking order regardless of what happens.
Mark Ingram and several of his New Orleans Saints teammates were turned away from a nightclub in London on Monday night, and early indications were that the decision was racially motivated. The club, however, says that is not what happened.
In a statement released on Tuesday, a representative from Cirque le Soir in Soho says Ingram and his friends were denied access because they had too many men in their group and not enough women — not because they were “too urban.”
“All of the team at Cirque le Soir are really upset by the suggestion that there was anything malicious in our turning away of Mark Ingram and his friends from the club on Monday 27th February,” the club said. “We proudly celebrate diversity, not only as part of our shows, but as part of who we are. We would not dismiss anyone as ‘too urban’ and we would not turn anyone away on the basis of their ethnicity, sexuality or any other characteristic — other than those expressed in our door policy: As an exclusive members club, we cannot guarantee entry to anyone and full discretion always lies with the door.
“… While we sympathise with Mark and his friends, we fully support our employees’ right to challenge groups that do not adhere to our door policy. Admitting an all-male group goes against our policy and is clearly stated on Facebook and on all reservation confirmation emails.”
If that is indeed the reason Ingram and company were turned away, it doesn’t explain where the phrase “too urban” came from or why it was allegedly used.
Ingram’s tweets about the incident went viral, and many other NFL players reacted to them. You can see some of those reactions here.
It certainly isn’t unheard of for nightclubs to balance the ratio of male-to-female patrons, though the Saints players and their friends were angry that they had reservations and were given a different reason for being stopped at the door. The truth about what actually happened likely lies somewhere in the middle.