Comments on: Do Not Talk About Greg LeMond’s Weenie http://larrybrownsports.com/cycling/do-not-talk-about-greg-lemonds-weenie/473 Brown Bag it, Baby Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:44:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Doubting GL http://larrybrownsports.com/cycling/do-not-talk-about-greg-lemonds-weenie/473/comment-page-1#comment-11927 Doubting GL Fri, 20 Jul 2007 05:24:08 +0000 http://larrybrownsports.com/2007/05/18/do-not-talk-about-greg-lemonds-weenie/#comment-11927 Lets look at Lemond for a sec- I personally doubt GL's claim of abuse. This alleged abuse occurred when GL was 13 and he supposedly doesn't remember if it lasted three months or a year and three months, but he remembers when it ended? Sounds fishy to me. Seems to me that GL needed some pr, and since the doping accusations backfired (oh yeah, because he LIED), what could have been more perfect? I mean, look at it this way - it's not politically correct to call bs on someone who is a supposed abuse survivor, so it's the perfect platform to sway public opinion in your favor. I can just see GL's PR idea - "I'll play the sympathy card - tell them I've been abused - they'll feel sorry for me and never doubt me again. They'll forget all about how I stick my nose in everybody's business and make false accusations because poor little Greg has been abused!" BS I say... for all of you who believe that GL had to drop the bomb because it was being dropped for him....none of this would have been made public if GL hadn't been there in the first place. GL chose to have this "dirty little secret" exposed by INVOLVING HIMSELF in something that was none of his business. GL used Landis by finding a way to inject himself into one of the biggest stories to ever hit cycling. What better way is there to make sure you'll never be forgotten??? Oh yeah, let's not forget the FACT that Lemond has lied about many other cyclists - claiming they've doped - to the point that he's been threatened with legal action in order to shut him up. Enough said Lets look at Lemond for a sec- I personally doubt GL’s claim of abuse. This alleged abuse occurred when GL was 13 and he supposedly doesn’t remember if it lasted three months or a year and three months, but he remembers when it ended? Sounds fishy to me. Seems to me that GL needed some pr, and since the doping accusations backfired (oh yeah, because he LIED), what could have been more perfect? I mean, look at it this way – it’s not politically correct to call bs on someone who is a supposed abuse survivor, so it’s the perfect platform to sway public opinion in your favor. I can just see GL’s PR idea – “I’ll play the sympathy card – tell them I’ve been abused – they’ll feel sorry for me and never doubt me again. They’ll forget all about how I stick my nose in everybody’s business and make false accusations because poor little Greg has been abused!”

BS I say… for all of you who believe that GL had to drop the bomb because it was being dropped for him….none of this would have been made public if GL hadn’t been there in the first place. GL chose to have this “dirty little secret” exposed by INVOLVING HIMSELF in something that was none of his business. GL used Landis by finding a way to inject himself into one of the biggest stories to ever hit cycling. What better way is there to make sure you’ll never be forgotten???

Oh yeah, let’s not forget the FACT that Lemond has lied about many other cyclists – claiming they’ve doped – to the point that he’s been threatened with legal action in order to shut him up.

Enough said

]]>