Jim Brown reiterates that he is not impressed with Trent Richardson

From the moment the Browns traded up to select Trent Richardson with the third overall pick in the 2012 draft, Jim Brown has made it clear that he does not agree with the decision. Many view Richardson as an electric player who can become a game-changer for the Browns’ offense, but the best running back in Cleveland history doesn’t see it that way. Brown reiterated that during an interview with ESPN Cleveland on Wedensday.

When radio host Tony Grossi told Brown that many have compared Richardson to Emmitt Smith, Brown said Smith was a “warrior” but he wouldn’t put him in his top tier of running backs anyway.

“If you look at Emmitt Smith and the kind of blocking he had, I don’t think he’d have close to the career he had (without it),” Brown said. “But if you take a Gale Sayers, Walter Payton, Eric Dickerson … Earl Campbell, there’s something special there.

“Emmitt was a warrior. But when it comes to the first level of backs, Emmitt would not be in my first level. So when I look at Richardson, I see adequate speed, adequate power, and a good attitude. But I don’t see anything special. And I don’t know if anyone can tell me there’s anything special.”

Every time Grossi countered Brown by talking about Richardson’s physical ability and explosiveness, Jim downplayed it and went back to the fact that he doesn’t see anything special from the Alabama Heisman Trophy finalist.

“I think Richardson is a fine young man,” he said. “I think he’s a good all-around football player. But from my standpoint, that’s ordinary. You talk about someone that’s going to move or light up the franchise or create a certain kind of thing, that’s what I’m talking about. I’m not trying to be mean. There are certain people you look at and there’s something special about them. I don’t see it.”

Obviously, the Browns disagree. Whether or not Brown actually believes Richardson is nothing special or he just has his own agenda is something we will never know for sure. Like Joe Namath and the Jets, Brown and the Browns are not on the best of terms. It’s either something against Cleveland or something against Richardson. If I were Trent, I’d be using it as bulletin board motivation.

H/T Eye on Football
Photo credit: Jason Miller-US PRESSWIRE

Around The Web

  • Gene

    I think Jim Brown’s comments about Emmitt Smith are right on target.  He often had five yard gains before anyone touched him.  He indeed had great blocking in front of him, which aided his longevity and productivity.

    However, I think we should all reserve judgment about Trent Richardson until his career is over.

  • http://larrybrownsports.com Larry Brown

    Maybe this is Brown’s underlying way of achieving some motivation for Trent.

  • Holly Wellman

    jim brown said rb tren richardson was an okay rb but the cleveland browns have alot of holes to fill and he didn’t think rb was the way to go right now.   his words and meaning are getting all twisted against him.

  • Holly Wellman

    all the great rb’s had great o-lines exept barry sanders,now if sanders had a line like emmit,jim brown,sayers,dickerson,cambell  …man his numbers would be untouchable.   richardson is the next great back but upfront we have two great o-lineman thomas and mack……you need more then two guys blocking unless you got crazy moves like barry sanders.

  • Holly Wellman

    personally i like rb trent richardson and love the pick.  i think jim brown is the greatest rb of all time.  and i see alot of jim brown in trent richardson…..i also think jim brown is being mis quoted and misunderstood.