<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time to Change the NFL Playoff Seeding Structure, Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larrybrownsports.com/football/nfl-playoff-seeding-structure-wild-card/4437/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larrybrownsports.com/football/nfl-playoff-seeding-structure-wild-card/4437</link>
	<description>Brown Bag it, Baby</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:51:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://larrybrownsports.com/football/nfl-playoff-seeding-structure-wild-card/4437/comment-page-1#comment-427552</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrybrownsports.com/?p=4437#comment-427552</guid>
		<description>As it turns out, the Titans, who went 13-3 and had the best season record in the NFL, have to play the 11-5 Ravens -- the remaining non-bye team with the BEST record.  That doesn&#039;t seem quite right, either -- Tennessee should be playing the 8-8 Chargers.

It&#039;s not quite as bad in the NFC, but the Giants should be playing the Cardinals, who had a worse record (albiet only slightly -- a loss instead of tie) than the Eagles.

The bye teams should be division winners and seeded 1-2. But seeds 3-6 should be based strictly on record, with the higher-seeded team in each game getting the home game.

I don&#039;t have a problem with winning the division being the first tie-breaker for seeding and home-field purposes (the Dolphins - Ravens game still would have been played in Miami, since Miami won their division and the Ravens didn&#039;t).

But, will the NFL owners seriously look at any change to the playoff seeding?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As it turns out, the Titans, who went 13-3 and had the best season record in the NFL, have to play the 11-5 Ravens &#8212; the remaining non-bye team with the BEST record.  That doesn&#8217;t seem quite right, either &#8212; Tennessee should be playing the 8-8 Chargers.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not quite as bad in the NFC, but the Giants should be playing the Cardinals, who had a worse record (albiet only slightly &#8212; a loss instead of tie) than the Eagles.</p>
<p>The bye teams should be division winners and seeded 1-2. But seeds 3-6 should be based strictly on record, with the higher-seeded team in each game getting the home game.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with winning the division being the first tie-breaker for seeding and home-field purposes (the Dolphins &#8211; Ravens game still would have been played in Miami, since Miami won their division and the Ravens didn&#8217;t).</p>
<p>But, will the NFL owners seriously look at any change to the playoff seeding?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpinMax</title>
		<link>http://larrybrownsports.com/football/nfl-playoff-seeding-structure-wild-card/4437/comment-page-1#comment-414844</link>
		<dc:creator>SpinMax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 01:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrybrownsports.com/?p=4437#comment-414844</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you on those ideas, division winners should still be in, but the 
seeding/home field should be based on records alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you on those ideas, division winners should still be in, but the<br />
seeding/home field should be based on records alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
