<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holiday Bowl Ruining Pac-10&#8217;s Rep</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larrybrownsports.com/college-football/holiday-bowl-ruining-pac-10s-rep/1178/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larrybrownsports.com/college-football/holiday-bowl-ruining-pac-10s-rep/1178</link>
	<description>Brown Bag it, Baby</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 04:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: WCT</title>
		<link>http://larrybrownsports.com/college-football/holiday-bowl-ruining-pac-10s-rep/1178#comment-66452</link>
		<dc:creator>WCT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrybrownsports.com/2007/12/27/holiday-bowl-ruining-pac-10s-rep/#comment-66452</guid>
		<description>I thought you were going to say that the Holiday Bowl ruins the Pac-10's rep because the Pac-10 participant usually gets destroyed.

The 3rd best big 12 school is 7-3 in the last 10 Holiday Bowls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you were going to say that the Holiday Bowl ruins the Pac-10&#8217;s rep because the Pac-10 participant usually gets destroyed.</p>
<p>The 3rd best big 12 school is 7-3 in the last 10 Holiday Bowls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cue Your Pac-10 Football Jokes Now. &#171; Signal to Noise</title>
		<link>http://larrybrownsports.com/college-football/holiday-bowl-ruining-pac-10s-rep/1178#comment-64302</link>
		<dc:creator>Cue Your Pac-10 Football Jokes Now. &#171; Signal to Noise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrybrownsports.com/2007/12/27/holiday-bowl-ruining-pac-10s-rep/#comment-64302</guid>
		<description>[...] The problem is that the Pac-10, as a conference in and of itself, provides the second best football to the SEC these days &#8212; they just don&#8217;t do bowl games well as of late, unless said team in the bowl game is USC, and that&#8217;s only reinforcing the popular perception across the rest of the country that the Pac-10 in football is the Trojans and a bunch of hangers-on. I understand what Larry&#8217;s getting at when he griped about the Holiday Bowl being well before New Year&#8217;s Eve and/or Day for the Pac-10, but I sense the non-USC teams would do well to actually win the bowls they are tied to with some regularity before getting some changes going. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The problem is that the Pac-10, as a conference in and of itself, provides the second best football to the SEC these days &#8212; they just don&#8217;t do bowl games well as of late, unless said team in the bowl game is USC, and that&#8217;s only reinforcing the popular perception across the rest of the country that the Pac-10 in football is the Trojans and a bunch of hangers-on. I understand what Larry&#8217;s getting at when he griped about the Holiday Bowl being well before New Year&#8217;s Eve and/or Day for the Pac-10, but I sense the non-USC teams would do well to actually win the bowls they are tied to with some regularity before getting some changes going. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Signal to Noise</title>
		<link>http://larrybrownsports.com/college-football/holiday-bowl-ruining-pac-10s-rep/1178#comment-64301</link>
		<dc:creator>Signal to Noise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrybrownsports.com/2007/12/27/holiday-bowl-ruining-pac-10s-rep/#comment-64301</guid>
		<description>Yes, the conference has awful tie-ins, but with last night's beating, it would help if Pac-10 teams not named USC would win some bowl games nowadays -- no matter when or where they are played.

ASU and UCLA are down, I don't think Oregon will beat South Florida with Brady Leaf at QB, and Cal is on such a bad slide that it's lucky to be in a bowl game. The conference could be 0-4 headed into the Rose Bowl and I wouldn't be surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the conference has awful tie-ins, but with last night&#8217;s beating, it would help if Pac-10 teams not named USC would win some bowl games nowadays &#8212; no matter when or where they are played.</p>
<p>ASU and UCLA are down, I don&#8217;t think Oregon will beat South Florida with Brady Leaf at QB, and Cal is on such a bad slide that it&#8217;s lucky to be in a bowl game. The conference could be 0-4 headed into the Rose Bowl and I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://larrybrownsports.com/college-football/holiday-bowl-ruining-pac-10s-rep/1178#comment-63766</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 21:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrybrownsports.com/2007/12/27/holiday-bowl-ruining-pac-10s-rep/#comment-63766</guid>
		<description>The powerful Tournament of Roses committee probably has the Pac-10 schedule the Holiday Bowl with as big a time difference as possible from the Rose Bowl game.

If it were a more respected bowl, the Pac-10 team would show up ready to play more often, instead of being disinterested because they so many times feel slighted out of a BCS Bowl (see Cal in 2004 and Oregon in 2005)

And, yeah, the Pac has terrible bowl tie-ins, partly due to the fans reluctance to travel and partly due to the late Tom Hansen being commissioner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The powerful Tournament of Roses committee probably has the Pac-10 schedule the Holiday Bowl with as big a time difference as possible from the Rose Bowl game.</p>
<p>If it were a more respected bowl, the Pac-10 team would show up ready to play more often, instead of being disinterested because they so many times feel slighted out of a BCS Bowl (see Cal in 2004 and Oregon in 2005)</p>
<p>And, yeah, the Pac has terrible bowl tie-ins, partly due to the fans reluctance to travel and partly due to the late Tom Hansen being commissioner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert</title>
		<link>http://larrybrownsports.com/college-football/holiday-bowl-ruining-pac-10s-rep/1178#comment-63664</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrybrownsports.com/2007/12/27/holiday-bowl-ruining-pac-10s-rep/#comment-63664</guid>
		<description>Larry, I agree completely.

With the championship game moving later and later every year, it would be easy for the Holiday Bowl to move to Jan. 1 or later.

The Pac-10 has horrendous bowl tie-ins. Not just the Holiday Bowl, but the others too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, I agree completely.</p>
<p>With the championship game moving later and later every year, it would be easy for the Holiday Bowl to move to Jan. 1 or later.</p>
<p>The Pac-10 has horrendous bowl tie-ins. Not just the Holiday Bowl, but the others too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
