Quantcast

Gary Bettman Explains the Switch from NBC to Versus

The commish joined Mike and the Mad Dog as a guest on WFAN on Monday and took quite the beating. The hosts were peppering him with questions — namely, why was the plug pulled on the Senators/Sabres game that went to overtime? Well, turns out that regardless of what the wrath and scorn of the media would lead you to believe, the plug was not pulled. In fact, Bettman knew quite well that the coverage of the game on NBC would be lost if it went to overtime.

It wasn’t something that just happened on Saturday. It was something that we knew could happen and it was something that we all planned for.

When we made our deal with NBC they had a pre-existing contractual relationship with the Preakness. Covering the Preakness is more than covering the two-minute race. There are a whole host of sponsors and advertisers who buy the time that leads up to the Preakness. NBC had an obligation to carry it.

We were getting this game to the widest coverage for the longest period of time. If we didn’t do this game on NBC even with the possibility that the game was going to be switched over for overtime, then the entire game would’ve been on Versus.

So there you go — justification from Bettman. And I think he’s just in a crappy position all-the-way around. It’s lose-lose. If they televise it on Versus, nobody sees it, and everyone laughs that a NHL Conference Finals game is on a channel nobody gets. They took a gamble hoping for the best, and they got burned. The only other plausible suggestion would have been to start the game earlier. That’s something Bettman really didn’t explain well. He tried to attribute it to re-seeding from round-to-round, and the uncertainty that the game could be on the West Coast. Lame. That would have been the best solution in my eyes.



Around The Web

  • Brad

    Hockey’s stupid anyways, shows how lame they are they can’t even televise a whole game

  • Ken

    Hey Larry -

    The NHL is way underrated as many arenas sell out all season and capacity was the highest in history this year. I think the elague should look for another nation network that would give it the same acclaim as The Preakness or any other sporting event. I think Versus’ coverage is much better than NBC and not so coincidently, Versus was in 40 million homes a year ago and is now in 72 million homes. I think the league is way underrated by the national media in terms of fan interest. Hey, how about my conspiracy theory that it is a Canadian-born and bred sport so the media, government, etc. try to keep its exposure and stature to a minimum in this country. Everything else is done under the table in the supposed good ole USA, so why not hockey ratings…Talk to you when college football starts! KEN

  • Pingback: Cheap Shots #25. « Signal to Noise

  • http://pointguardu.com NICK

    Hockey doesnt suck but this was a shitty move on NBC’s part. Who care about some horses 4 hours before a race? they should have kept with this game. this move has compared to Abc or whoever it was that switched from the superbowl to heidi!!!!!

  • http://www.larrybrownsports.com Larry Brown

    well, hard to say about a canadian theory because hockey was so popular here only a matter of years ago. And Bettman said the same thing about Versus. They do a great job covering the games, so if they get into 10 million more homes, there would be no reason to leave.