Comments on: Why isn’t UCLA #1? http://larrybrownsports.com/college-basketball/why-isnt-ucla-1/174 Brown Bag it, Baby Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:26:35 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: gpjohn http://larrybrownsports.com/college-basketball/why-isnt-ucla-1/174/comment-page-1#comment-174 gpjohn Sat, 03 Mar 2007 02:00:28 +0000 http://larrybrownsports.com/2007/03/02/why-isnt-ucla-1/#comment-174 dude the pac 10 is forever dissed making it all the sweeter when the bruins bring home yet another national championship to the W(b)est Coast screw those fat xeno/homo/culture-phobes in the flyover territories dude the pac 10 is forever dissed

making it all the sweeter when the bruins bring home yet another national championship to the W(b)est Coast

screw those fat xeno/homo/culture-phobes in the flyover territories

]]> By: Gene http://larrybrownsports.com/college-basketball/why-isnt-ucla-1/174/comment-page-1#comment-172 Gene Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:18:41 +0000 http://larrybrownsports.com/2007/03/02/why-isnt-ucla-1/#comment-172 The Bruins have the number 1 RPI and the more quality wins, as you pointed out. They also have been competitive in every game, unlike the Buckeyes. Duhhh..... Could the reason be East Coast bias??? Maybe ESPN's television contracts with the Big Ten and ACC have something to do with it, do you think? Does ESPN even know that the Pac 10 plays pretty good basketball? The Bruins have the number 1 RPI and the more quality wins, as you pointed out. They also have been competitive in every game, unlike the Buckeyes.

Duhhh….. Could the reason be East Coast bias??? Maybe ESPN’s television contracts with the Big Ten and ACC have something to do with it, do you think? Does ESPN even know that the Pac 10 plays pretty good basketball?

]]>